Lange v. Hoskins et al
Plaintiff: Rick D. Lange
Defendant: Charles W. Hoskins, KPMG LLP, James A. Laphen, Gilbert G. Lundstrom, Campbell R. McConnell and Eugene B. Witkowicz
Case Number: 4:2012cv03148
Filed: July 23, 2012
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office: 4 Lincoln Office
Presiding Judge: Richard G. Kopf
Presiding Judge: Cheryl R. Zwart
Nature of Suit: Stockholders Suits
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1334 ab Civil Proceeding (BK)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 30, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 122 ORDER - The 120 Joint Motion for Entry of Bar Order is GRANTED. Any objection to the Motion is DENIED in its entirety. The Trustee's request for entry of an order barring certain claims is GRANTED as set forth within the order. This Court shall retain jurisdiction to interpret and enforce the terms of this Order.Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (MKR)
October 6, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 117 ORDER that on or before October 20, 2014, and not less than once every 4 months thereafter, the parties shall each file a status report as previously directed by the court in its memorandum and order entered on April 21, 2014 111 . A party's failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (JSF)
April 21, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 111 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER -The intervenor's motion for summary judgment (filing 90 -1) and any related filings are denied as moot. The magistrate judges findings, recommendation and order (filing 79 ) are adopted and sustained. The plaintiffs state ment of objections and request for oral argument (filing 81 ) are denied. The defendants motion to compel arbitration (filing 42 ) is granted, and this case is stayed; in all other respects, the motion is denied. The parties shall each file a status report, not less than once every 4 months, regarding the progress of their arbitration. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (MKR)
January 15, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 101 ORDER granting 100 Stipulation. All proceedings on FDIC-R's motion for summary judgment (filing 90-1), and any related filings, are stayed until January 30, 2014. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED on the court's own motion that all proceedings on the following pending matters are also stayed until January 30, 2014: KPMG's motion to compel arbitration (filing 5); KPMG's amended motion to compel arbitration and motion to dismiss (filing 13); Trustee's motion to remand and abs tain (filing 30); KPMG's motion to compel arbitration and motion to dismiss (filing 42); Magistrate Judge's findings, recommendation, and order (filing 79); and KPMG's statement of objections (filing 81). Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (ADB)
December 18, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 99 ORDER granting 98 Stipulation TO STAY MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. All proceedings on FDIC-R's motion for summary judgment (filing 90-1), and any related filings, are stayed until January 10, 2014. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED on the court's own motion that all proceedings on the following pending matters are also stayed until January 10, 2014: KPMG's motion to compel arbitration (filing 5); KPMG's amended motion to compel arbitration and motion to dismiss (filing 13); Trus tee's motion to remand and abstain (filing 30); KPMG's motion to compel arbitration and motion to dismiss (filing 42); Magistrate Judge's findings, recommendation, and order (filing 79); and KPMG's statement of objections (filing 81). Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (ADB, )
November 19, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 97 ORDER granting 88 the parties' Joint Stipulation and all proceedings on FDIC-R's motion for summary judgment [90-1], and any related filings are stayed until 12/10/13. All proceedings on the following pending matters are also stayed until December 10, 2013: 1. KPMG's motion to compel arbitration 5 ; 2. KPMG's amended motion to compel arbitration and motion to dismiss 13 ; 3. Trustee's motion to remand and abstain 30 ; 4. KPMG's motion to compel arbitration and motion to dismiss 42 ; 5. Magistrate Judge's findings, recommendation, and order 79 ; and 6. KPMG's statement of objections 81 . Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (JSF)
November 18, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 96 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that the pretrial proceedings in Case Nos. 8:13CV168 and 4:12CV3148 are consolidated. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (JSF)
October 24, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 87 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that pursuant to the 85 Findings and Recommendation referral of this matter to the bankruptcy court is withdrawn and this action shall proceed in the district court. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (ADB)
March 28, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 84 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - This case is referred to the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Nebraska. This case shall be terminated for statistical purposes by the Clerk of the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska. The Clerk of the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska shall deliver the court file to the Clerk of the Bankruptcy Court for the District of Nebraska. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (GJG)
February 15, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 77 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff's statement of objections (filing 69 ) is denied except to the extent noted in the foregoing memorandum. Plaintiff's request for oral argument is denied. The Magistrate Judge's order entered November 20, 2012 (filing 65 ), is sustained and shall not be disturbed. Plaintiff shall respond to the FDIC's complaint for declaratory judgment (filing 68 ) within 14 days. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (AOA)
November 20, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 65 ORDER granting 39 Motion to Intervene. The FDIC shall file its proposed claim for declaratory relief on or before December 3, 2012.The FDICs response to the Motion to Compel Arbitration and Dismiss Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint 42 is due on or before December 10, 2012. Any reply shall be filed by December 20, 2012. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (BHC)
October 31, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 62 ORDER regarding MOTION to Intervene 39 filed by Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. On or before November 7, 2012 the plaintiff shall provide the court with a list of the respective officers and directors for TierOne Corporation and TierOne Bank from 2002 to 2010 including the dates the individuals served in such capacity and any committees on which the individuals served. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (JAB)
September 10, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 50 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - After conferring with the parties, 1) Any opposition to KPMG's motions to compel arbitration, (filing nos. 5 , 13 , and 42 ), and the FDIC's motion to intervene, (filing no. 39 ), shall be filed on or before S eptember 24, 2012. Any reply thereto shall be filed on before October 4, 2012.2) The deadline for responding to the plaintiff's motion to remand and to abstain, (filing no. 30 ), is continued. Any response to the motion for remand or to abs tain shall be filed on or before ten days following the court's (meaning the ruling of the district judge as and if required) ruling on KPMG's motions to compel arbitration and/or the FDIC's motion to intervene.3) The deadline for filing an answer or response to the plaintiff's complaint is continued. The Defendants' answer or other responsive pleading shall be filed within thirty (30) days after the court (including any ruling by the district judge as required) resolves plaintiff's motion to remand this case.Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (JAB) Modified on 9/11/2012 to correct date of filing. (JAB)
August 15, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 20 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER regarding pending motions: 1) Plaintiff and Individual Defendants motion to withdraw filing no. 18 , (filing no. 19 ) is granted in insofar as the CM/ECF text entry improperly identifies KPMG, LLP as a filing party and a pa rty seeking relief. The portion of the docket entry identifying KPMG, LLP as a party seeking relief shall be stricken. The motion to withdraw is denied in all other respects.2) To the extent Plaintiff and Individual Defendants have agreed that De fendants Charles W. Hoskins, Campbell R. McConnell, Gilbert G. Lundstrom, James A. Laphen and Eugene Witkowsicz shall have an extension of time in which to file their respective answers or other responsive pleading and that agreement is represented b y filing no. 18 , the stipulation for an extension is granted. The Individual Defendants' answer or other responsive pleading shall be due thirty (30) days after the court resolves Plaintiff's forthcoming motion to remand this case. The parties do not need to resubmit their Joint Motion to Extend. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (JAB)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lange v. Hoskins et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Charles W. Hoskins
Represented By: James K. McCall
Represented By: Douglas A. Sondgeroth
Represented By: James L. Thompson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: KPMG LLP
Represented By: George B. Curtis
Represented By: Robert M. Gonderinger
Represented By: Monica K. Loseman
Represented By: Elizabeth A. Sevcik
Represented By: David J. Skalka
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James A. Laphen
Represented By: Kathryn E. Jones
Represented By: Thomas J. Kenny
Represented By: Edward G. Warin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gilbert G. Lundstrom
Represented By: Minja Herian
Represented By: Gregory C. Scaglione
Represented By: David A. Yudelson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Campbell R. McConnell
Represented By: James K. McCall
Represented By: Douglas A. Sondgeroth
Represented By: James L. Thompson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Eugene B. Witkowicz
Represented By: Minja Herian
Represented By: Gregory C. Scaglione
Represented By: David A. Yudelson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rick D. Lange
Represented By: Joel A. Bacon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?