Patsios v. Colvin
Debra D. Patsios |
Carolyn W. Colvin |
Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration |
4:2013cv03134 |
July 15, 2013 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
4 Lincoln Office |
Warren K. Urbom |
Social Security: RSI Tax Suits |
42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 42 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that the plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1) (filing 38 ) is granted. An attorney fee of $6,000.00 shall be paid by the plaintiff from past due benefits withheld by the defendant. A separate judgment will be entered. Ordered by Judge John M. Gerrard. (LAC) |
Filing 36 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER regarding Plaintiff's MOTION for Attorney Fees 32 filed by Debra D. Patsios. The plaintiff's motion for attorney fees (filing 32) is granted. By separate document, the Court shall enter judgment for plaintiff and against defendant providing that plaintiff is awarded attorney fees of $5,251.12. Ordered by Judge John M. Gerrard. (SLP) |
Filing 30 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that this case is reversed and remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. A separate judgment will be entered. Ordered by Judge John M. Gerrard. (JSF) |
Filing 4 ORDER granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (ADB, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.