Allen v. Kenney
Lloyd E. Allen |
Michael L. Kenney |
Nebraska Attorney General |
4:2014cv03049 |
March 6, 2014 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
4 Lincoln Office |
Laurie Smith Camp |
Pro Se Docket |
Habeas Corpus: General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 28 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that this matter is dismissed with prejudice, and a separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum and Order. The court will not issue a certificate of appealability in this matter. Ordered by Chief Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(ADB) |
Filing 9 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that upon initial review of the Petition (Filing No. 1), the court preliminarily determines that Petitioner's claim, as set forth in this Memorandum and Order, is potentially cognizable in federal court. By August 18, 2014 , Respondent shall file a motion for summary judgment or state court records in support of an answer. Petitioner's 6 Motion to Appoint Counsel is denied. Ordered by Chief Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(copies mailed as directed) (ADB) |
Filing 8 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (Filing No. 3 ) is provisionally granted and Petitioner will not be required to pay the $5.00 fee at this time. Ordered by Chief Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(TCL ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.