Hickman-Smith v. Schmader et al
| Timothy Hickman-Smith |
| Two John Doe unknown Omaha Police officers and Schmader |
| 4:2014cv03205 |
| October 8, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 4 Lincoln Office |
| Pro Se Docket |
| Lyle E. Strom |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
7
MEMORANDUM OPINION on the Court's order for the plaintiff to show cause by December 19, 2014, why this case should not be dismissed based on plaintiff's failure to sign his complaint. To date, plaintiff has not shown cause and he has not signed his complaint. A separate order will be entered dismissing plaintiffs complaint for failure to comply with Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (Copy mailed ailed to pro se party)(MKR)
|
|
Filing
6
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER- Plaintiff shall have until December 19, 2014, to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to comply with Rule 11. If plaintiff does not respond, or if good cause is not shown, this action will be dismissed wi thout prejudice and without further notice. ***Pro Se Case Management Deadlines: ( Pro Se Case Management Deadline set for 12/19/2014: deadline for plaintiff to show cause why pleading was not signed) Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(MKR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
