Marr v. Dunning et al
Plaintiff: Doug Marr
Defendant: Douglas County, Nebraska and Tim Dunning
Case Number: 8:2012cv00018
Filed: January 11, 2012
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office: 8 Omaha Office
Presiding Judge: Lyle E. Strom
Presiding Judge: Thomas D. Thalken
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 29, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 46 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that the Court finds that Mr. Marr has persistently failed to prosecute his complaint, such that in the interests of justice, the complaint will be dismissed with prejudice. A separate order will be entered in accordance with this memorandum opinion. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (ADB)
March 5, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 45 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - the plaintiff shall show cause, inwriting, on or before March 15, 2013, why this action should not be dismissed with prejudice. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (ADB)
October 23, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER - Scheduling Conference set for 11/5/2012 08:15 AM in Chambers before Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (TCL )
July 2, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER granting 28 Motion for Leave. Plaintiff shall have until July 6, 2012, to file his second amended complaint. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (ADB)
June 7, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER granting 22 Motion for Leave; plaintiff shall have until 6/18/12 to file his Amendeded Complaint. The withdrawal of objections and motions to strike 26 is granted; filings 23 Motion to Strike and 25 Motion to Strike are deemed withdrawn. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (ADB)
April 23, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER - Scheduling Conference set for 5/10/2012 08:15 AM in Chambers before Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom.Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (TCL )
March 8, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER granting 12 Motion for Leave. Plaintiff shall have until March 15, 2012, to file his amended complaint. The parties shall submit their Rule 26(f) report within ten days after defendants have filed their answers. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (ADB)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Marr v. Dunning et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Doug Marr
Represented By: Roger R. Holthaus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Douglas County, Nebraska
Represented By: Theresia M. Urich
Represented By: Sandra K. Connolly
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tim Dunning
Represented By: Sandra K. Connolly
Represented By: Theresia M. Urich
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?