Valentic v. Omaha Public Power District et al
| Rick J. Valentic |
| Law Office of Melany S Chesterma, Anderson, Ferguson & Acierno, Law Office of Melany S Chesterman - O'Brien with Hauptman, O'Brien Wolf & Lathrop, P.C, Law Office of Sheldon M. Gallner, P.C., Nebraska Equal Opportunity Commission, Omaha Public Power District Board Members, Melany O'Brien, Nebraska Workers' Compensation Court, Sheldon Gallner, James L Quinlan, Sara L. McGill, Attorneys at Law with Fraser Stryker, P.C., L.L.O. Representing Omaha Public Power District and U.S. Equal Opportunity Commission |
| Omaha Public Power District |
| 8:2013cv00131 |
| April 23, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 8 Omaha Office |
| Joseph F. Bataillon |
| F.A. Gossett |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
41
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration, Filing No. 40 , is denied. Defendants' motion to dismiss, Filing No. 13 , is granted. Defendants' motion to dismiss, Filing No. 21 , is granted. Defendants' motion to dismiss, Filing No. 28 , is granted. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(GJG)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER - The plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (Filing No. 4 ) is denied as moot. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(GJG)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
