United States of America v. Mohamed et al

Justia Dockets & Filings Eighth Circuit Nebraska District Court United States of America v. Mohamed et al

United States of America v. Mohamed et al

Petitioner:	United States of America
Respondent:	Abdiaziz Y. Mohamed
Case Number:	8:2013cv00227
Filed:	July 30, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office:	8 Omaha Office
Presiding Judge:	Laurie Smith Camp
Presiding Judge:	F.A. Gossett
Nature of Suit:	Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action:	26 U.S.C. § 7402 IRS: Petition to Enforce IRS Summons
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 16, 2013	Filing 9 ORDER - The allegations in the Petition (filing 1 ) are deemed admitted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Respondent shall comply with the summons attached to the Petition by September 30, 2013. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the United States shall prompt ly inform the Court of Respondent's full compliance or non-compliance with the Summons. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerks Office mail a copy of this Order to Respondent. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett. (Copy mailed as directed) (AOA)
August 2, 2013	Filing 3 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - A copy of this Order, together with the Petition and attachments thereto, be personally served on the Respondent by an official of the Internal Revenue Service who is hereby specially appointed for that purpose, and that such service be made pursuant to Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. within 20 days after service of copy of this Order, the Respondent shall file and serve a written response to the Petition. If the Respondent has any defense to present or m otion to make in opposition to the Petition, such defenses or motions, if any, shall be made in writing and filed with the Court, and copies served on the United States Attorney. Only those issues raised by motion or brought into controversy by res ponsive pleading(s) shall be considered by the Court. Any uncontested allegations in the Petition shall be deemed admitted. In the event no written response to the Petition is filed and served in accordance with this Order, or in the event the respo nses filed do not deny or controvert the allegations of the Petition, the allegations in the Petition will be deemed admitted, and an order will be entered compelling the Respondent to comply with the summons described in the Petition. in the e vent the Respondent files a written response pursuant to this Order which denies or controverts allegations of the Petition, the Respondent shall appear before the United States District Court in Omaha, Nebraska, at 10:00 a.m. on the 13th day of September, 2013, at Courtroom 6 in the Roman Hruska United States Courthouse to show cause why Respondent should not be compelled to comply with the Internal Revenue Service summons served on February 5, 2013. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett. (AOA)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 16, 2013

Filing 9 ORDER - The allegations in the Petition (filing 1 ) are deemed admitted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Respondent shall comply with the summons attached to the Petition by September 30, 2013. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the United States shall prompt ly inform the Court of Respondent's full compliance or non-compliance with the Summons. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerks Office mail a copy of this Order to Respondent. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett. (Copy mailed as directed) (AOA)

August 2, 2013

Filing 3 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - A copy of this Order, together with the Petition and attachments thereto, be personally served on the Respondent by an official of the Internal Revenue Service who is hereby specially appointed for that purpose, and that such service be made pursuant to Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. within 20 days after service of copy of this Order, the Respondent shall file and serve a written response to the Petition. If the Respondent has any defense to present or m otion to make in opposition to the Petition, such defenses or motions, if any, shall be made in writing and filed with the Court, and copies served on the United States Attorney. Only those issues raised by motion or brought into controversy by res ponsive pleading(s) shall be considered by the Court. Any uncontested allegations in the Petition shall be deemed admitted. In the event no written response to the Petition is filed and served in accordance with this Order, or in the event the respo nses filed do not deny or controvert the allegations of the Petition, the allegations in the Petition will be deemed admitted, and an order will be entered compelling the Respondent to comply with the summons described in the Petition. in the e vent the Respondent files a written response pursuant to this Order which denies or controverts allegations of the Petition, the Respondent shall appear before the United States District Court in Omaha, Nebraska, at 10:00 a.m. on the 13th day of September, 2013, at Courtroom 6 in the Roman Hruska United States Courthouse to show cause why Respondent should not be compelled to comply with the Internal Revenue Service summons served on February 5, 2013. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett. (AOA)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. Mohamed et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: United States of America
Represented By:	Laurie A. Kelly
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Abdiaziz Y. Mohamed
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?