Reynolds v. Colvin
| Ryan L. Reynolds |
| Carolyn W. Colvin and U.S. Attorney Genera Eric H. Holder |
| Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration |
| 8:2014cv00065 |
| March 3, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 8 Omaha Office |
| F.A. Gossett |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
32
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part the 28 Motion for EAJA Fee. Plaintiff is awarded attorney's fees in the amount of $7,300.00, subject to offset to satisfy any pre-existing debt owned by Plaintiff to the United States. Judgment will be entered by separate document. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett. (MKR)
|
|
Filing
26
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER-Judgment shall be entered by separate document providing that the decision of the Commissioner is reversed and this case is remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett. (MKR)
|
|
Filing
9
STRICKEN-MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The plaintiff's motion for attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act, ECF No. 23 , is granted, and the plaintiff is awarded attorney's fees in the amount of $2,351.52. This amount is to be paid directly to the plaintiff by the Social Security Administration. Ordered by Senior Judge Warren K. Urbom. (MKR) Modified on 3/3/2014 to strike per Order 10 (MKR).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
