McDade
| Anthony C. McDade |
| Nebraska Attorney General |
| 8:2014cv00133 |
| April 17, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 8 Omaha Office |
| Pro Se Docket |
| Richard G. Kopf |
| Habeas Corpus: General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
13
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that the plaintiff has not responded to this court's Memorandum and Order 11 and has not updated his address with the court. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: This action is dismissed without prejudice, and a separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum and Order. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(ADB)
|
|
Filing
11
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, - Plaintiff shall have 20 days from the date of this Memorandum and Order to apprise the court of his current address, in the absence of which this matter will be dismissed without prejudice and without further notice. The Clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: July 7, 2014: deadline for informing court of address. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(AOA)
|
|
Filing
9
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Petitioner's application to proceed IFP (Filing No. 4 ) is denied. Petitioner is granted until July 9, 2014, to pay the $5.00 filing fee. Petitioner is warned that if the fee is not paid as required, the court may dismiss this case without further notice. The Clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: July 9, 2014: deadline for Petitioner to pay $5.00 filing fee. No further review of this case will take place until the filing fee is paid. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(GJG)
|
|
Filing
3
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that Petitioner is directed to correct the technical defects listed in this order within 30 days of the date of this Memorandum and Order. Failure to comply with this Memorandum and Order will result in dismissal of this matter w ithout further notice. The Clerk of the court is directed to send to Petitioner the Form AO241 and the Form AO240. The Clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this matter with the following text: May 28, 2014: Check for MIFP or payment and amended petition. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party with forms) (JSF)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: McDade | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Interested party: Nebraska Attorney General | |
| Represented By: | Jon C. Bruning |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Anthony C. McDade | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
