Armed Forces Bank, N.A. v. FSG-4, LLC et al
| Armed Forces Bank, N.A. |
| FSG-4, LLC and John A. Ritter |
| 2:2011cv00654 |
| April 26, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| James C. Mahan |
| George Foley |
| Negotiable Instrument |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
43
ORDER Denying without prejudice 42 Proposed Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 2/15/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER Denying 34 Motion for Sanctions. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 1/23/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDERED that 25 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED in part. The claim for alleged breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing may proceed. The claim for equitable estoppel is dismissed. FURTHER ORDERED that 27 Motion to Strike is DENIED. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 11/10/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER Granting 14 Verified Petition for Permission to Practice Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Kyle S. Hirsch and approving Designation of Local Counsel Matthew G. Holland for Armed Forces Bank, N.A.. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 7/25/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
