Gaines v. Cox et al
| Ronald Kwame Gaines |
| Trinity Pharris, Sheryl Foster, Nevada Department of Corrections, Dwight Nevens and James Cox |
| 2:2013cv00174 |
| February 1, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Nancy J. Koppe |
| James C. Mahan |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
31
ORDER Granting Defendant's 20 Motion to Dismiss. The clerk is instructed to enter judgment and close the case. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 5/22/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER Denying 16 Motion for Discovery. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 10/17/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER that The clerk shall electronically serve a copy of this order and the courts original 10 screening order the office of the attorney general. The attorney generals office shall file a notice of the defendants for whom it accepts service and who it does not accept service within 21 days. Answer due within 60 days. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 8/29/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF; CC: K. Howe - SLR)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER RE: Informal Settlement Discussions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 6/3/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
