Stojic v. Aguillard et al
| James Branko Stojic |
| Robert Sigal, Michael Fairweather, Douglas E. Smith, Ronda C. Hrustyk, A. Aguillard, Richard Tannery and Timothy Townley |
| 2:2013cv00521 |
| March 26, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Carl W. Hoffman |
| Gloria M. Navarro |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
13
ORDER that all claims for injunctive and declaratory relief in the complaint are DISMISSED without prejudice. FURTHER ORDERED that all remaining claims in the complaint are STAYED pending the outcome of plaintiff's state criminal proceedings, t hrough to the completion of all proceedings on direct review of any judgment of conviction. FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSE this action until such time as the Court grants a motion to reopen the matter. The Clerk additionally shall mail an informational hard copy of this order to the Hon.Douglas E. Smith, District Judge, Regional Justice Center, 200 Lewis Ave., Las Vegas, NV 89155, in connection with No. C-12-285105-1 in the state district court. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 3/4/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER that 9 Motion to Screen Complaint is denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 7/9/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
