United States of America v. $257,497.93 in United States Currency
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: $257,497.93 in United States Currency
Case Number: 2:2013cv01691
Filed: September 16, 2013
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Las Vegas Office
Presiding Judge: Lloyd D. George
Presiding Judge: George Foley
Nature of Suit: Forfeit/Penalty: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 30, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 45 DEFAULT JUDGMENT is entered against Tony H. Xie, Xin Hui Liu, Neng M. Ren, Shui Ying Zou, Lan Qing Liu, Chang Biao Zheng, Hui Qing Chen, Henry Zhiheng Xu, Yan Louie, Yidong Zheng, and all persons or entities who may claim an interest in the $25 7,497.93 in United States Currency in the above-entitled action. FURTHER ORDERED that that Final Judgment of Forfeiture is entered against the $257,497.93 in United States Currency and Feng Zheng.FURTHER ORDERED that the $257,497.93 in United States Currency is forfeited to the United States of America, and no right, title, or interest in the property shall exist in any other party, other than Feng Zheng, whose rights and liabilities are adjudged below.FURTHER ORDERED that, t he property having been forfeited, within a practicable time hereafter for the United States, the United States must release to Feng Zheng, through Patricia Marr, one payment of $78,542.92, less any debt owed the United States, any agency of the United States, or any debt in which the United States is authorized to collect.IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2465(a)(2), that there was reasonable cause for the seizure or arrest of the property. Signed by Judge Lloyd D. George on 9/30/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
April 25, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 42 ORDER that 36 Claimaint Xin Hui Liu's Motion to Withdraw Claim is GRANTED. THE COURT FURTHER ORDERS that Claimant Xin Hui Liu's verified claim in the amount of $3,031.07 is withdrawn with prejudice. Signed by Judge Lloyd D. George on 4/25/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
May 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER Granting 22 Motion to Strike the Computer-Generated Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order Due Date re Docket Entry 20 Answer to Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 5/30/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
September 20, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER for Summons and Warrant of Arrest in Rem for the Property and Notice. Signed by Judge Lloyd D. George on 8/20/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. $257,497.93 in United States Currency
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: $257,497.93 in United States Currency
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By: Michael A Humphreys
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?