Sand Creek Partners, LTD et al v. American Federal Savings and Loan Association of Colorado et al
Plaintiff: William L. Bergman, Larry Bortles and Sand Creek Partners, LTD
Defendant: American Federal Savings and Loan Association of Colorado and Resolution Trust Corporation Receiver for American Savings of Colorado
Interested Party: Cadle Company
Case Number: 2:2014cv00444
Filed: November 17, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Las Vegas Office
Presiding Judge: Cam Ferenbach
Presiding Judge: Gloria M. Navarro
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 10, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 73 ORDER that the 59 Bench Warrant Issued for Defendant Larry Bortles is QUASHED. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 10/10/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - copy hand delivered to USM - SLD)
March 2, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 58 ORDER that the 48 Report and Recommendation is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED. Cadle Company's 44 Motion to Find Larry Bortles in Contempt of Court is GRANTED. Plaintiff must comply with the Court' s 36 Order. Plaintiff shall reimburse Cadle Company the sum of $2,786.50 as its expenses, including attorneys' fees, incurred to identify and present to the Court evidence of Plaintiffs violation of the Courts orders. A bench warrant shall be issued against Plaintiff to co mpel his compliance with this Order and shall remain outstanding for so long as Plaintiff does not fully cure his contempt. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 3/2/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - hand delivered to USM - SLD)
April 15, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 36 ORDER that 31 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff Sand Creek Partners, Ltd. has until May 15, 2015 to retain new counsel who must file a notice of appearance in accordance with the Local Rules of Pra ctice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs Larry Bortles and William L. Bergman must either retain counsel or file a notice of appearing pro se within 30 days from the entry of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 29 Motion to Compel is GRANTED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 4/15/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - cc: Plaintiffs - TR)
April 2, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER Granting 33 Motion for Leave to Appear Telephonically. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 4/2/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
January 26, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER Granting the Cadle Company's 16 Motion for Aid. The Cadle Company's 18 Motion to Compel is Denied. In the event that the parties' dispute cannot be resolved without court intervention, the Cadle Company is granted leave to file a renewed motion to compel by 2/20/2015. Larry Bortles' 25 Motion to Vacate re 23 Order is Denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 1/26/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
November 17, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER that the Cadle Company must file a Supplement Motion to the 16 MOTION for Aid re 15 WRIT OF EXECUTION by 12/1/2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 11/17/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sand Creek Partners, LTD et al v. American Federal Savings and Loan Association of Colorado et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: American Federal Savings and Loan Association of Colorado
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Resolution Trust Corporation Receiver for American Savings of Colorado
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: William L. Bergman
Represented By: J. Mitchell Cobeaga
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Larry Bortles
Represented By: J. Mitchell Cobeaga
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sand Creek Partners, LTD
Represented By: J. Mitchell Cobeaga
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Cadle Company
Represented By: James R. Adams
Represented By: Assly Sayyar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?