Miller v. State of Arizona Department of Corrections et al
| Steven Miller |
| Alhambra Flamingo Central Prison, Captain Dayfan, State of Arizona Department of Corrections and Warden Fouts |
| 2:2014cv00628 |
| April 22, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Andrew P. Gordon |
| Carl W. Hoffman |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
14
ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 4/2/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DKJ)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER Accepting Report and Recommendation. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs objections 8 , 11 are OVERRULED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Hoffmans Orders 5 , 10 are AFFIRMED. Plaintiffs complaint 6 is dismissed without prejudice, with leave to amend. Plaintiff has 30 days from entry of this Order in which to file an amended complaint. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 2/27/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DKJ)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER Granting 4 Plaintiff's Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall file Plaintiff's Complaint. The Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. Amended Complaint deadline: 6/5/2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 05/06/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
