Covarrubias v. State of Nevada et al
| Phillip A. Covarrubias |
| Attorney General State of Nevada and State of Nevada |
| 2:2014cv01200 |
| July 23, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Peggy A. Leen |
| Gloria M. Navarro |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
7
USCA ORDER Denying 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Phillip A. Covarrubias. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DC)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER that 3 Application to Proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 4 Motion for Appointment of Counsel is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk shall add Catherine Cortez Masto as counsel for respondent s. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk shall electronically serve respondents with a copy of 1 Petition and a copy of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Circuit Rule 22-3(a), the clerk of the court shall refer this action to t he United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk of the court shall administratively close this action. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 10/20/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - cc: 9th Circuit Court of Appeals - EDS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
