Mays v. Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC et al
Marcus Mays |
Nevada Association Services Inc and Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC |
2:2014cv01593 |
September 29, 2014 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Las Vegas Office |
Andrew P. Gordon |
Carl W. Hoffman |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 32 JUDGMENT in favor of Nevada Association Services, Inc. and Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC. against Plaintiff Marcus Mays. Signed by Clerk of Court, Lance S. Wilson on 10/5/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PS) |
Filing 28 ORDER on pending Motions, and Order to Show Cause why Sanctions should not be imposed. IT IS ORDERED that Defendant Ocwen and NAS's Motions to Dismiss 11 & 14 are GRANTED. Mays may file an Amended Complaint within 14 days of entry of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Ocwen's Motion 21 to Expunge Lis Pendens is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Ocwen's Motion for hearing 25 is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, within 14 days of entry of th is Order, Chelsea Crowton shall file a brief showing cause, if any she has, why sanctions should not be imposed against her for repeated violations of the Court's Orders and Local Rules. Amended Complaint deadline: 6/30/2015. Show Cause Response due by 6/30/2015. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 6/15/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PS) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.