New Balance, Inc. v. LaCrosse Technology, LLC; et al
New Balance, Inc. |
LaCrosse Technology, LLC and Tammy Delores Lier |
2:2014cv01937 |
November 21, 2014 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Las Vegas Office |
Peggy A. Leen |
James C. Mahan |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 38 ORDER Granting 37 Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 8/13/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DC) |
Filing 35 ORDER Granting 30 Motion to Substitute Party. Warrior Sports, Inc. substituted for New Balance, Inc. The Motion to Dismiss is Denied as Moot. Defendants shall have until August 11, 2015 to file any request for an adjustment of the discove ry plan and scheduling order deadlines necessitated by the substitution of Warrior Sports, Inc. by stipulation or motion and/or any request for monetary sanctions as outlined in this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 7/27/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DC) |
Filing 15 ORDER granting 12 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Mark A. Solomon withdrawn from the case. Attorney designation deadline: 2/26/2015. Certificate of Interested Parties due by 2/26/2015. Clerk of Court shall mail Defendant ClickMedia with a copy of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 2/9/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DC) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.