Barnes v. Nevens et al
Petitioner: Demar Rahymes Barnes
Respondent: Attorney General of the State of Nevada and D.W. Nevens
Case Number: 2:2014cv01946
Filed: November 21, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Las Vegas Office
Presiding Judge: Peggy A. Leen
Presiding Judge: Richard F. Boulware
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 52 ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 21 the First Amended Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner is denied a certificate of appealability. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 7/13/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC)
November 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 46 ORDER that 45 Motion for Leave to File Reply Three Days Late is GRANTED. The reply to the answer filed on November 2, 2018, is deemed timely. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 11/6/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
September 28, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ORDER granting 42 Motion to Extend Time. Petitioner shall have to and including October 30, 2018, to file his reply to the respondents' answer to the petition for writ of habeas corpus in this case. Absent an extraordinary showing of cause, no further requests for extension of time are likely to be granted in this case. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 9/28/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
August 29, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 41 ORDER granting 40 Motion to Extend Time to Reply re 36 Answer to Amended Habeas Petition. Petitioner shall have to and including September 27, 2018, to file his reply to the respondents' answer to the petition for writ of habeas corpus in this case. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 8/29/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
March 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER that respondents shall file an answer to the habeas petition in this case within sixty (60) days of the date of this order and that petitioner may file a reply thereto within sixty (60) days of service of the answer. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 3/6/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
February 5, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER that 25 Respondents' Motion to Dismiss is DENIED. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 2/5/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
December 29, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER Granting 27 Motion to Extend Time to Respond re 25 Motion to Dismiss. Responses due by 12/14/2016. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 12/29/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
September 13, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER that 18 Motion to Extend Time to File an Amended Petition is GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED that 19 Motion to Extend Time to File a Motion for Stay is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 9/12/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
July 8, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER that 15 Motion to Extend Time to File an Amended Petition is GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED that 16 Motion to Extend Time in which to File a Motion for Stay, if deemed necessary, is GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner shall have sixty (60 ) days from the date of entry of this order, to FILE AND SERVE on respondents an amended petition for writ of habeas corpus, which shall include all known grounds for relief (both exhausted and unexhausted). Petitioner shall have sixty (60) days fro m the date of entry of this order to FILE AND SERVE on respondents a motion for a stay, if deemed necessary. FURTHER ORDERED that respondents shall have thirty (30) days after service of an amended petition within which to answer, or otherwise resp ond to, the amended petition. If petitioner does not file an amended petition, respondents shall have thirty (30) days from the date on which the amended petition is due within which to answer, or otherwise respond to, petitioners original petit ion. If petitioner files a motion for a stay, the motion shall be briefed by the parties pursuant to Rule 7-2 of the Local Rules of Civil Practice. FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court SHALL MODIFY the docket to indicate petitioner's couns el of record is the Federal Public Defender's Office, as indicated on the noticeof appearance. FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner shall file no further pro se documents and shall proceed by and through appointed counsel. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 7/8/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
May 9, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER Granting 13 Motion to Extend Time to file Motion for Stay. Motions due by 6/1/2016. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 5/9/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
March 31, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER that the Court reconsiders its previous Order 5 denying appointment of counsel and now GRANTS petitioner's request for appointment of counsel. FURTHER ORDERED that the Federal Public Defender's Office is appointed to represent the petitioner in this case. The Clerk of Court shall serve this Order on the Federal Public Defender's Office. FURTHER ORDERED that the petitioner shall have sixty (60) days to file an Amended Petition. FURTHER ORDERED that 10 Motion for a Stay is DENIED without prejudice. FURTHER ORDERED that 7 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED without prejudice. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 3/31/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
June 29, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER that 2 Motion to Appoint Counsel is DENIED. The clerk shall file and electronically serve the petition upon respondents. Respondents shall have forty-five (45) days from entry of this order within which to answer, or otherwise respond to, the petition. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 6/29/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
January 20, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER that 1 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED. Petitioner shall have thirty (30) days from the date this order is entered in which to have the $5.00 filing fee sent to the Clerk. FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall RETAIN the petition but not file it at this time. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 1/20/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Barnes v. Nevens et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: D.W. Nevens
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Demar Rahymes Barnes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?