Hoot v. University of Nevada, Las Vegas et al
| Robert Hoot |
| Lori Olafson and University of Nevada, Las Vegas |
| 2:2015cv00175 |
| January 30, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Peggy A. Leen |
| Richard F. Boulware |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
25
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 3/11/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that 10 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Amended complaint due within 21 days. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 17 Motion to Strike is GRANTED. 16 Sur-reply is STRICKEN. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 22 Motion to Continue District Judge Hearing is DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 1/25/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER Granting 12 Stipulation to Stay Fed.R.Civ.P.26(f) Conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 5/6/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER Granting 8 Motion to Extend Time to Respond re 5 Amended Complaint. University of Nevada, Las Vegas answer due 4/17/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 4/15/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
