Amadis Payano v. Colvin

Amadis Payano v. Colvin

Plaintiff:	Ingrid V. Amadis Payano
Defendant:	Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number:	2:2015cv00294
Filed:	February 19, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office:	Las Vegas Office
Presiding Judge:	Carl W. Hoffman
Presiding Judge:	Richard F. Boulware
Nature of Suit:	Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 14, 2017	Filing 23 JUDGMENT on Attorney Fees in favor of Ingrid V. Amadis Payano in the amount of $3,500.00 under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and costs in the amount of $400.00 under 28 U.S.C. § 1920. This awar d is without prejudice to the rights of Marc V. Kalagian and/or the Law Offices of Rohlfing & Kalagian, LLP to seek Social Security Act attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), subject to the savings clause provisions of the EAJA. Signed by Clerk of Court Debra K. Kempi on 12/14/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
October 23, 2017	Filing 19 ORDER that the 16 Report and Recommendation is Adopted in part. Plaintiff's 12 Motion for Reversal and Remand is Granted in part and Denied in part. Defendant's 13 Motion to Affirm the Agency's Decision is Granted in part and Denied in part. This matter is remanded to the Social Security Administration for further proceedings. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 10/23/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

Date Filed

Document Text

December 14, 2017

Filing 23 JUDGMENT on Attorney Fees in favor of Ingrid V. Amadis Payano in the amount of $3,500.00 under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and costs in the amount of $400.00 under 28 U.S.C. § 1920. This awar d is without prejudice to the rights of Marc V. Kalagian and/or the Law Offices of Rohlfing & Kalagian, LLP to seek Social Security Act attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), subject to the savings clause provisions of the EAJA. Signed by Clerk of Court Debra K. Kempi on 12/14/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

October 23, 2017

Filing 19 ORDER that the 16 Report and Recommendation is Adopted in part. Plaintiff's 12 Motion for Reversal and Remand is Granted in part and Denied in part. Defendant's 13 Motion to Affirm the Agency's Decision is Granted in part and Denied in part. This matter is remanded to the Social Security Administration for further proceedings. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 10/23/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Amadis Payano v. Colvin
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ingrid V. Amadis Payano
Represented By:	Joshua R Harris
Represented By:	Marc V Kalagian
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Represented By:	Jean M. Turk
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?