Hicks v. Dollar General Market
| Natasha Hicks |
| Dollar General Market |
| 2:2015cv00405 |
| March 5, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Jennifer A. Dorsey |
| Peggy A. Leen |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
38
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that 36 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED; this case is DISMISSED for failure to serve it by the court's extended deadline. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 31 , 35 plaintiff's remaining motions are DENIED as moot, and all hearings and deadlines are VACATED. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE THIS CASE. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 9/19/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 20 Dollar General's motion to quash service is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Hicks has until 8/16/17, to properly serve Dolgen Midwest, LLC d/b/a Dollar General with a copy of the amended complaint and summons. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 7/17/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that 15 the magistrate judge's report and recommendation is ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Hicks's discrimination claim is dismissed without prejudice and that all claims against Richard A. Lindsey, Tiffany Doe, Bianca Doe, and Cindy Doe are DISMISSED. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 3/1/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED Plaintiff Natasha Hicks' 12 Motion for Pro Se Litigant to File Electronically is GRANTED. On or before 2/17/17, Ms. Hicks must provide certification that she has completed the CM/ECF tutorial. See Order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 1/30/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER Granting 9 Motion for Pro Se Litigant to File Electronically. Certification due 5/11/16. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 4/19/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 6 Report and Recommendation is WITHDRAWN and SET ASIDE. 7 Motion to Extend Time is GRANTED. Amended Complaint is due 5/13/16. The Clerk of the Court shall mail Ms. Hicks one blank form complaint foremployment discrimination actions along with the instructions for completing theform, one copy of 5 Complaint, and one copy of 4 Screening Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 3/3/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hicks v. Dollar General Market | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Dollar General Market | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Natasha Hicks | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
