United States of America v. $21,000 in United States Currency

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit Nevada District Court United States of America v. $21,000 in United States Currency

United States of America v. $21,000 in United States Currency

Plaintiff:	United States of America
Defendant:	$21,000 in United States Currency
Case Number:	2:2015cv00586
Filed:	March 31, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office:	Las Vegas Office
Presiding Judge:	Carl W. Hoffman
Presiding Judge:	James C. Mahan
Nature of Suit:	Drug Related Seizure of Property
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 12, 2015	Filing 13 DEFAULT JUDGMENT of Forfeiture is entered against: (1) the $21,000 in United States Currency; (2) James Alan Stone aka James Alan Townley; (3) Richard Spurlock; and (4) all persons or entities who claim an interest in the $21,000 in United States Currency in the above-entitled action. FURTHER ORDERED that the $21,000 in United States Currency be, and the same is hereby forfeited to the United States of America, and no right, title, or interest in the property shall exist in any o ther party. IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2465(a)(2), that there was reasonable cause for the seizure or arrest of the defendant property. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 6/12/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
April 1, 2015	Filing 3 ORDER for Summons and Warrant of Arrest in Rem for the Property. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 4/1/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Date Filed

Document Text

June 12, 2015

Filing 13 DEFAULT JUDGMENT of Forfeiture is entered against: (1) the $21,000 in United States Currency; (2) James Alan Stone aka James Alan Townley; (3) Richard Spurlock; and (4) all persons or entities who claim an interest in the $21,000 in United States Currency in the above-entitled action. FURTHER ORDERED that the $21,000 in United States Currency be, and the same is hereby forfeited to the United States of America, and no right, title, or interest in the property shall exist in any o ther party. IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2465(a)(2), that there was reasonable cause for the seizure or arrest of the defendant property. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 6/12/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

April 1, 2015

Filing 3 ORDER for Summons and Warrant of Arrest in Rem for the Property. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 4/1/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. $21,000 in United States Currency
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: $21,000 in United States Currency
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By:	Michael A Humphreys
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?