Brady et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
| Elena M Brady and Steven J. Brady |
| Wells Fargo & Company, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Wells Fargo Home Morgage |
| 3:2014cv00440 |
| August 20, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Reno Office |
| William G. Cobb |
| Robert C. Jones |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
15
ORDER DISMISSING CASE under Rule 41(b); denying all pending motions; directing Clerk to enter judgment and close case. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 6/25/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDERED that the Motions for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction (## 8 , 9 ) are DENIED. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 6/9/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER Plaintiff shall file amended complaint by 5/29/2015 or this action will be dismissed. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 4/29/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDERED the # 1 IFP Application is GRANTED. Clerk shall FILE the # 1 -1 Complaint. The Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. Amended complaint due by 9/24/2014; entitled "AMENDED COMPLAINT", with case number above. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 8/25/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
