Villatoro v. LeGrand et al
Petitioner: Balmore Alexander Villatoro
Respondent: Robert LeGrand and Nevada Attorney General
Case Number: 3:2014cv00467
Filed: September 10, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Reno Office
Presiding Judge: William G. Cobb
Presiding Judge: Robert C. Jones
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDERED that the amended petition (ECF No. 9 ) is DENIED in its entirety. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and close this case. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 11/6/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
February 16, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDERED that petitioner's motion for stay and abeyance (ECF No. 28 ) is DENIED. P shall file sworn declaration re abandonment or dismissal of unexhausted claims by 3/18/2017. If P elects to abandon then answer to remaining grounds due 30 days from service of declaration; Reply due 30 days thereafter. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 2/16/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
March 4, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER granting in part 17 Motion to Dismiss: Ground 2 is unexhausted. Petitioner to have 30 days to notify the Court re the unexhausted claims. If Petitioner elects to abandon the unexhausted grounds, Respondents to have 30 days from Petit ioner's declaration of abandonment to answer remaining grounds; Petitioner to reply 30 days thereafter. Respondents' 23 Motion to Extend Time is granted nunc pro tunc. See order for further details. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 3/3/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
October 21, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER Counsel for petitioner shall meet with petitioner as soon as possible to review items as listed in attached order. Amended Petition due by 4/10/2015. Please see attached for further details and deadlines. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 10/21/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Villatoro v. LeGrand et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Robert LeGrand
Represented By: Jeffrey M Conner
Represented By: Catherine Cortez-Masto
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Nevada Attorney General
Represented By: Jeffrey M Conner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Balmore Alexander Villatoro
Represented By: Rene Valladares
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?