Hendrix v. State of Nevada et al
Jamal Damon Hendrix |
Renee Baker, James G. Cox and Nevada, State Of |
3:2014cv00576 |
November 12, 2014 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Reno Office |
Valerie P. Cooke |
Miranda M. Du |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 ORDER granting 10 Motion to Dismiss and denying 17 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Petitioner is denied a certificate of appealability. Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 6/19/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC) |
Filing 8 ORDER granting 7 Motion. Clerk shall send to petitioner one copy of his # 4 petition. ( Sent 12/29/2014. ) Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 12/29/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) |
Filing 3 ORDER Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis 1 is granted. Clerk shall file and electronically serve petition 1 -1 on respondents. Respondents shall file response to petition within 90 days (see attached for further de tails). Hard copy of state court record exhibits shall be forwarded to staff attorneys in Reno. Clerk shall detach and file motion for appointment of counsel 1 -2. Motion is denied. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 12/8/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.