Computer Sciences Corporation v. Cognizant Technology Solutions U.S. Corporation et al
Computer Sciences Corporation |
Cognizant Technology Solutions U.S. Corporation and John Maguire |
3:2015cv00267 |
May 20, 2015 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Reno Office |
Valerie P. Cooke |
Howard D. McKibben |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 51 ORDER - The defendants' # 5 Motion to dismiss is DENIED. The alternative application to transfer this action to the United States District Court in the District of Virginia is GRANTED. The court will transfer this action to the Eastern District of Virginia. The parties may file any objections to the transfer to the Eastern District of Virginia rather than the Western District of Virginia on or before November 23, 2015. Transfer of this action will be stayed pending the filing of any timely objections. Should no objections be filed the action will be transferred on November 25, 2015. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 11/18/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) |
Filing 49 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke, on 10/9/2015, denying 35 Motion to Stay. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.