USA v. Morrison et al
| 1:2009cv00397 |
| November 25, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of New Hampshire |
| Concord Office |
| James R. Muirhead |
| Taxes |
| 26 U.S.C. ยง 7403 Suit to Enforce Federal Tax Lien |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
45
ORDER Approving Receiver's Sale of Real Property Located at 2161 Main Street, Bethlehem, New Hampshire, and Directing Distribution of Sale Proceeds. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty.(kad)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER granting 41 Motion to Appoint Receiver. Century 21 Winn Associates appointed. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty.(kad)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER. The case is automatically stayed as to the bankrupt party. Additionally, in the interest of judicial economy, it is ordered that the casealso be stayed as to all other parties. It is therefore ordered that the counsel f or Petitioner in Bankruptcy shall file a status report on January 1 and July 1 of each year until the issues are resolved. Pursuant to LR 77.4(f), the clerk is directed to statistically close the case. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty. (Status Report due by 7/1/2011) (kad)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: USA v. Morrison et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
