Graham v. NH State Prison for Women, Warden et al
| Kristyn Graham |
| Jean Chapman, John Eppillito, Jr., Edmund Hucks, Kristy Moen, NH State Prison for Women, Warden and Marni Nicholas |
| NH Attorney General - Notice Only - CV (Court Use Only) and NH Department of Corrections - Notice Only - CV (Court Use Only) |
| 1:2010cv00332 |
| August 3, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of New Hampshire |
| Concord Office |
| Joseph N. Laplante |
| Prisoner - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
13
///ORDER approving 6 Report and Recommendations; and approving 12 Report and Recommendations. So Ordered by Judge Joseph N. Laplante. (cmp)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER re: 6 Report and Recommendations referring petitioner's objection (doc no. 8) to the Magistrate Judge for further review. Signed by Judge Joseph N. Laplante. (cmp)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER denying 4 Motion for to Waive the Filing Fee. Clerk's Office to serve NHAG as provided in Agreement on Acceptance of Service. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty. (dae)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER granting 2 Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis as to Kristyn Graham, initial fee of $9.00 due no later than September 13, 2010. No further action by court until initial fee paid. Failure to pay will result in dismissal. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Lynch. Fee due 9/13/2010. (amm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
