Seacoast Motorcycles, Inc. v. North Hampton, Town of
| Seacoast Motorcycles, Inc. |
| North Hampton, Town of |
| NH Citizens Against Loud Motorcycles |
| 1:2010cv00532 |
| November 17, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of New Hampshire |
| Concord Office |
| Environmental Matters |
| Civil Miscellaneous Case |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
17
ORDER re 12 Bill of Costs. Seacoast's application for costs and fees, doc. no. 12, is granted in full. NH CALM shall pay Seacoast $8,807.50. Upon notification by Seacoast that NH CALM has complied with this order, the clerk of the court shall close this case. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty. (kad)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER granting 3 Motion to Remand to State Court. This case is remanded to the Rockingham County Superior Court. In addition, Seacoast is entitled to the reasonable attorney's fees and costs it incurred as a result of t he removal. The court shall retain jurisdiction to resolve Seacoasts request for fees and costs. Seacoast shall file a request for costs and fees within twenty days of the date of this order in accordance with Local Rule 54.1(b). NH CALM shall then have an opportunity to respond to that request pursuant to section (c) of that rule. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty. (kad)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
