Riley v. USA
| Daniel Riley |
| USA |
| 1:2012cv00047 |
| February 6, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of New Hampshire |
| Concord Office |
| George Z. Singal |
| Prisoner: Vacate Sentence |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
43
ORDER re 41 Addendum/Supplement to 39 Objection to Report and Recommendation, 42 Addendum/Second Supplement to 39 Objection to Report and Recommendation : Having reviewed the objections de novo and alternatively considered each as a motion seeking reconsideration, the Court hereby DENIES Petitioners Supplemental Objections. So Ordered by Judge George Z. Singal.(ko)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER AFFIRMING 37 Report and Recommendation: Recommended Decision of Magistrate Judge is hereby AFFIRMED. Petitioner's 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion (ECF No. 1) is DENIED WITH PREJUDICE, and his Petition is DISMISSED. So Ordered by Judge George Z. Singal.(ko)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER granting 33 Motion for reply due date. Petitioners reply is due no later than December 26, 2012, and shall not exceed thirty (30) pages (inclusive of any exhibits and attachments). So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Margaret J. Kravchuk.(ko)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER denying 24 Motion Recuse New Hampshire United States Attorney's Office. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Margaret J. Kravchuk.(ko)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER ON NONCONFORMING DOCUMENT 17 Second Motion to Amend 1 Motion to Vacate - 2255 Motion. ( Cure Document by 7/30/2012.) So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Margaret J. Kravchuk.(jeb)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER ON NONCONFORMING DOCUMENT re: 15 Motion to Amend 1 Motion to Vacate-2255 and Other Clarifications filed by Daniel Riley.( Cure Document by 7/23/2012.) So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Margaret J. Kravchuk.(jeb)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER re 9 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Petitioner to notify Court by 7/1/2012 to indicate if he is waiving all statutory rights to counsel. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Margaret J. Kravchuk.(ko)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER: The US Attorney is ordered to file an answer within 60 days or file a motion within 30 days, from the date of this order, re 1 Motion to Vacate Sentence - 2255. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Margaret J. Kravchuk.(ko)
|
|
Filing
4
CONCURRING ORDER re: 3 Designated Case Order Out: Judge George Z. Singal has been designated and assigned to preside over this case. USMJ Margaret J. Kravchuk is assigned to perform such duties as may be assigned to her by the district judge to whom this case is assigned. So Ordered by Chief Judge John A. Woodcock.(jeb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Riley v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: USA | |
| Represented By: | Seth R. Aframe |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Daniel Riley | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
