Chartrand v. NH Department of Corrections
| Bradford Chartrand |
| NH Department of Corrections and NH, State of |
| NH Department of Corrections - Notice Only - CV (Court Use Only) and NH Attorney General - Notice Only - CV (Court Use Only) |
| 1:2012fp00255 |
| August 20, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of New Hampshire |
| Concord Office |
| Joseph N. Laplante |
| Landya B. McCafferty |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
14
///ORDER re 10 Report and Recommendation: No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty dated February 11, 2013. So Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph N. Laplante.(ko) Modified on 4/26/2013 to add: ///(ko).
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER granting 3 Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis as to Bradford Chartrand. Given the plaintiffs current balance is $0.39 there shall be no initial filing fee assessed. Going forward, however, the plaintiff shall b e responsible for monthly payments of 20% of each preceding months income credited to his account, which shall be remitted by the Institution when the amount in the account exceeds $10.00 until the sum of $350.00 has been paid. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty.Finance Follow Up Deadline 10/19/2012(jeb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
