Brescia v. UBS Financial Services Inc.
Glen Brescia and The Estate of Toni Ann Brescia (Aresco) |
UBS Financial Services Inc. |
The Estate of Toni Ann Brescia (Aresco) |
Glen Brescia |
UBS Financial Services Inc. |
UBS Financial Services Inc. |
1:2013cv00004 |
January 4, 2013 |
US District Court for the District of New Hampshire |
Concord Office |
Joseph N. Laplante |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1001 E.R.I.S.A. |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 32 ///ORDER granting 27 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Glen Brescia; denying 29 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by The Estate of Toni Ann Brescia. The clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and close the case. If no appeal of the judgment is taken within the time allowed by rule, the clerk shall release the interpleader funds, together with interest, to Glen. So Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph N. Laplante.(jb) |
Filing 24 PROCEDURAL ORDER re Pretrial Conference scheduled for June 19, 2013 at 11:30 a.m. before Chief Judge Joseph N. Laplante. So Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph N. Laplante.(jb) |
Filing 18 ORDER re Amendment to proposed consent order for interpleader and other relief. So Ordered by U.S. Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Lynch.(ko) |
Filing 8 ORDER OF RECUSAL. Judge Paul J. Barbadoro recused - appearance filed by Attorney Kenneth Bartholomew. So Ordered by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro.(mm) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.