Cole v. Fluery et al
| Christopher Cole |
| FNU Dube and FNU Fluery |
| NH Attorney General - Notice Only - CV (Court Use Only) and NH Department of Corrections - Notice Only - CV (Court Use Only) |
| 1:2013cv00274 |
| June 18, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of New Hampshire |
| Concord Office |
| Steven J. McAuliffe |
| Landya B. McCafferty |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
38
///ORDER granting 34 Motion for Summary Judgment. Clerk shall enter judgment and close the case. So Ordered by Judge Landya B. McCafferty.(gla)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER Directing Clerk to Make Service upon the New Hampshire Office of the Attorney General, as provided in the Agreement on Acceptance of Service, electronic copies of: this order, the complaint (doc. no. 1), and the motion for expedited ruling (doc. no. 3); denying without prejudice 3 motion for expedited ruling. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty.(jab)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER granting 2 Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis as to Christopher Cole, initial fee of $-0-. In addition, monthly payments of 20% of each preceding months income credited to the plaintiffs account shall be remitted by the Institution when the amount in the account exceeds $10.00 until the sum of $350.00 has been paid. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty.Finance Follow Up Deadline 8/19/2013(lml)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
