NEW JERSEY DIVORCE CENTER INC. v. NJ DIVORCE CENTER
Plaintiff: NEW JERSEY DIVORCE CENTER INC.
Defendant: NJ DIVORCE CENTER
Case Number: 1:2013cv02490
Filed: April 18, 2013
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Office: Camden Office
County: Salem
Presiding Judge: Jerome B. Simandle
Presiding Judge: Karen M. Williams
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 Trademark Infringement
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 15, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 13 FINAL JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION re: 8 Motion for Default Judgment. Signed by Chief Judge Jerome B. Simandle on 11/15/2013. (TH, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: NEW JERSEY DIVORCE CENTER INC. v. NJ DIVORCE CENTER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: NEW JERSEY DIVORCE CENTER INC.
Represented By: NORMAN ELLIOT LEHRER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NJ DIVORCE CENTER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?