NAVARRETE-RACHED v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff: GUSTAVO NAVARRETE-RACHED
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Case Number: 1:2013cv07678
Filed: December 19, 2013
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Office: Camden Office
County: Cumberland
Presiding Judge: Renee Marie Bumb
Nature of Suit: Deportation
Cause of Action: 08 U.S.C. ยง 1252
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 7, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER, ORDERED that Pltf's application is denied for lack of jurisdiction; ORDERED that no transfer of Pltf's application is warranted in light of the application being facially unripe, etc. Signed by Judge Renee Marie Bumb on 1/7/2014. (dmr)(n.m.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: NAVARRETE-RACHED v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: GUSTAVO NAVARRETE-RACHED
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?