KEARNEY v. LIMELITE COACH WORKS
Plaintiff: STEPHANIE M. KEARNEY
Defendant: LIMELITE COACH WORKS
Case Number: 2:2009cv02219
Filed: May 8, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Office: Newark Office
County: Bergen
Presiding Judge: Faith S. Hochberg
Presiding Judge: Patty Shwartz
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 13, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER ordering plaintiff to serve and file a submissison providing certain information and defendant to respond to plaintiff's submission by June 3, 2009 etc. Signed by Judge Faith S. Hochberg on 5/13/09. (cs, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: KEARNEY v. LIMELITE COACH WORKS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: STEPHANIE M. KEARNEY
Represented By: MARK T. MCMENAMY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LIMELITE COACH WORKS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?