PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY v. SCOTT IMHOFF COMPANY, INC. et al

Plaintiff: PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant: SCOTT IMHOFF COMPANY, INC. and MCRS, LLC
Case Number: 2:2013cv00647
Filed: February 1, 2013
Court: New Jersey District Court
Office: Newark Office
County: Morris
Referring Judge: Madeline C. Arleo
Presiding Judge: Susan D. Wigenton
Nature of Suit: Personal Property: Other
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Jury Demanded By: None

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY v. SCOTT IMHOFF COMPANY, INC. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY
Represented By: JEFFREY M. ZIELINSKI
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SCOTT IMHOFF COMPANY, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MCRS, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.