TREMCO CANADA DIVISION, RPM CANADA v. DARTRONICS, INC.

Plaintiff: TREMCO CANADA DIVISION, RPM CANADA
Defendant: DARTRONICS, INC.
Case Number: 2:2013cv01641
Filed: March 15, 2013
Court: New Jersey District Court
Office: Newark Office
County: Middlesex
Presiding Judge: Stanley R. Chesler
Referring Judge: Cathy L. Waldor
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
June 4, 2013 20 Opinion or Order of the Court OPINION fld. Signed by Judge Stanley R. Chesler on 6/4/13. (sr, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: TREMCO CANADA DIVISION, RPM CANADA v. DARTRONICS, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: TREMCO CANADA DIVISION, RPM CANADA
Represented By: STEVEN MILES LUCKS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DARTRONICS, INC.
Represented By: MICHAEL JAY JURISTA
Represented By: GREGORY E TOMCZAK
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.