FRUIT FLOWERS, LLC v. JAMMALA, LLC et al
| FRUIT FLOWERS, LLC |
| JAMMALA, LLC and MUNTHER DARAMNEH |
| 2:2014cv05834 |
| September 19, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Newark Office |
| Bergen |
| Michael A. Hammer |
| Esther Salas |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1121 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
13
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 12 Report and Recommendations, granting 11 Motion for Attorney Fees, filed by FRUIT FLOWERS, LLC. Signed by Judge Esther Salas on 4/14/16. (DD, )
|
|
Filing
10
OPINION/ORDER granting 8 Motion for Default Judgment; that Defendants, their relatives, subsidiaries, affiliates, officers, including but not limited to, agents, distributors, retailers, servants, employees, attorneys, and those in active conce rt or participation with them, who receive actual notice of this order by personal service or otherwise, are ordered to within fifteen (15) days after entry of this Permanent Injunction to file with this Court, and serve upon Plaintiffs counsel wi thin thirty (30) days, a written report; that Plaintiff shall submit supporting documents and a separate application for reasonable attorneys fees, costs and disbursements within 14 days of the date of this Opinion and Order. ***CIVIL CASE TERMINATED. Signed by Judge Esther Salas on 9/29/15. (DD, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
