NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. KIELCZEWSKI et al
Petitioner: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Respondent: SLAWOMIR KIELCZEWSKI and KIELCZEWSKI CORP.
Case Number: 2:2015cv02697
Filed: April 15, 2015
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Office: Newark Office
County: Essex
Presiding Judge: Claire C. Cecchi
Presiding Judge: Mark Falk
Nature of Suit: Labor/Management Relations
Cause of Action: Motion to Compel
Jury Demanded By: None
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. KIELCZEWSKI et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Represented By: BERT DICE-GOLDBERG
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: SLAWOMIR KIELCZEWSKI
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: KIELCZEWSKI CORP.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?