UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. GAVETT

Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: ROBERT L. GAVETT, SR.
Case Number: 3:2010cv04084
Filed: August 10, 2010
Court: New Jersey District Court
Office: Trenton Office
County: Somerset
Referring Judge: Douglas E. Arpert
Presiding Judge: Joel A. Pisano
Nature of Suit: Taxes (US Plaintiff or Defendant)
Cause of Action: 26:7401
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 10, 2011 31 Opinion or Order of the Court OPINION filed. Signed by Judge Joel A. Pisano on 5/10/2011. (mmh)
October 7, 2010 7 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER setting Initial Scheduling Conference for 11/18/2010 @ 10:30 A.M.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Arpert on 10/7/2010. (ce3)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. GAVETT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: ARI DAVID KUNOFSKY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ROBERT L. GAVETT, SR.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.