NICOLOUDAKIS v. BOCCHINI
Petitioner: FRANKLIN NICOLOUDAKIS
Respondent: JOE BOCCHINI
Case Number: 3:2013cv02009
Filed: March 29, 2013
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Office: Trenton Office
County: Mercer
Presiding Judge: Joel A. Pisano
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 1, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 53 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Michael A. Shipp on 7/1/2016. (km)
March 8, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 48 MEMORANDUM OPINION filed. Signed by Judge Michael A. Shipp on 3/7/2016. (eaj)
July 15, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 39 OPINION filed. Signed by Judge Michael A. Shipp on 7/15/2015. (eaj) (Main Document 39 replaced on 7/15/2015) (eaj, ).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: NICOLOUDAKIS v. BOCCHINI
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: FRANKLIN NICOLOUDAKIS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: JOE BOCCHINI
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?