PLYMOUTH PARK TAX SERVICES LLC et al v. PRINCETON OFFICE PARK, LLC

Appellant: PLYMOUTH PARK TAX SERVICES LLC
Appellee: PRINCETON OFFICE PARK, LLC
Case Number: 3:2014cv02125
Filed: April 4, 2014
Court: New Jersey District Court
Office: Trenton Office
County: Mercer
Presiding Judge: Michael A. Shipp
Nature of Suit: Appeal
Cause of Action: 28:0158
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
January 30, 2015 20 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION filed. Signed by Judge Michael A. Shipp on 1/30/2015. (mmh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: PLYMOUTH PARK TAX SERVICES LLC et al v. PRINCETON OFFICE PARK, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellant: PLYMOUTH PARK TAX SERVICES LLC
Represented By: STEPHEN B. MCNALLY(Designation Retained)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellee: PRINCETON OFFICE PARK, LLC
Represented By: MORRIS S. BAUER(Designation Retained)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.