Daye v. Community Financial Service Centers, LLC

Justia Dockets & Filings Tenth Circuit New Mexico District Court Daye v. Community Financial Service Centers, LLC

Daye v. Community Financial Service Centers, LLC

Plaintiff:	Clara Daye
Defendant:	Community Financial Service Centers, LLC
Case Number:	1:2014cv00759
Filed:	August 22, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the District of New Mexico
Office:	Albuquerque Office
County:	McKinley
Presiding Judge:	James O. Browning
Presiding Judge:	Steven C. Yarbrough
Nature of Suit:	Truth in Lending
Cause of Action:	15 U.S.C. § 1640
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 30, 2017	Filing 167 MEMORANDUM OPINION, FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND ORDER by District Judge James O. Browning finding that Speedy Loan's misrepresentations did not damage the Plaintiffs, because those misrepresentations made Speedy Loan's loans a ppear more expensive than they actually were. Consequently, the named plaintiff can recover statutory damages and attorney's fees, but the unnamed plaintiffs can recover nothing. The Court also determines that Speedy Loan must return the interest and fees it collected from the Plaintiffs to the extent that it collected more than the New Mexico Small Loan Act, N.M. Stat. Ann. §§ 58-15-1 to -39, permits; and, denying the Opposed Motion to Strike Witnesses 95 . (kw)
January 20, 2017	Filing 138 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 89 97 Opposed MOTIONS for Summary Judgment and 101 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply by District Judge James O. Browning. (vv)

Date Filed

Document Text

November 30, 2017

Filing 167 MEMORANDUM OPINION, FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND ORDER by District Judge James O. Browning finding that Speedy Loan's misrepresentations did not damage the Plaintiffs, because those misrepresentations made Speedy Loan's loans a ppear more expensive than they actually were. Consequently, the named plaintiff can recover statutory damages and attorney's fees, but the unnamed plaintiffs can recover nothing. The Court also determines that Speedy Loan must return the interest and fees it collected from the Plaintiffs to the extent that it collected more than the New Mexico Small Loan Act, N.M. Stat. Ann. §§ 58-15-1 to -39, permits; and, denying the Opposed Motion to Strike Witnesses 95 . (kw)

January 20, 2017

Filing 138 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 89 97 Opposed MOTIONS for Summary Judgment and 101 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply by District Judge James O. Browning. (vv)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Daye v. Community Financial Service Centers, LLC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Clara Daye
Represented By:	Richard N. Feferman
Represented By:	Nicholas H. Mattison
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Community Financial Service Centers, LLC
Represented By:	Donald Kochersberger
Represented By:	Alicia M. LaPado
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?