Dale Rutherford, et al v. B. Todd Jones

Plaintiff: Dale Rutherford and Tracy Rifle and Pistol, Inc.
Defendant: B. Todd Jones
Case Number: 2:2012cv00167
Filed: February 23, 2012
Court: New Mexico District Court
Office: Las Cruces Office
County: Eddy
Presiding Judge: John E. Conway
Referring Judge: Lourdes A. Martinez
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:2201
Jury Demanded By: None

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dale Rutherford, et al v. B. Todd Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dale Rutherford
Represented By: James B. Vogts
Represented By: Jeffrey M. Croasdell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tracy Rifle and Pistol, Inc.
Represented By: Jeffrey M. Croasdell
Represented By: James B. Vogts
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: B. Todd Jones
Represented By: Lesley Farby
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.