Virovlyanskiy v. Virovlyanskaya
Appellee: Juliya Virovlyanskaya
Appellant: Aleksandr Virovlyanskiy
Case Number: 1:2013cv01511
Filed: March 21, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Brooklyn Office
Presiding Judge: Raymond J. Dearie
Nature of Suit: Bankruptcy Appeal (801)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1334 Bankruptcy Appeal
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 6, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 13 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: The Court affirms the judgment of the bankruptcy court. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case. C/M. Forwarded for judgment. Ordered by Judge Raymond J. Dearie on 5/2/2014. (Chee, Alvin)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Virovlyanskiy v. Virovlyanskaya
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellee: Juliya Virovlyanskaya
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellant: Aleksandr Virovlyanskiy
Represented By: Karamvir Dahiya
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?