Gluco Perfect, LLC et al v. Perfect Gluco Products, Inc. et al
Gluco Perfect, LLC, Joy Mernone and U.S. Health & Home Care, Inc. |
Francine Freiman, William J. Gillen, John and Jane Does 1 through 10, Perfect Gluco Products, Inc., Andre Ramnauth and USHH Products, Inc. |
Glenn Mernone and Perfect Care, Inc. |
1:2014cv01678 |
March 13, 2014 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Brooklyn Office |
Kiyo A. Matsumoto |
Ramon E. Reyes |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act) |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 115 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. Ordered by Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto on 1/7/2016. For the reasons stated in the attached Memorandum and Order, plaintiffs motion for default judgment is denied. The court also denies plaintiffs motion in the alternative to strike the Answer. Pursuant to Judge Reyes Order dated November 24, 2015, the parties must file pre-motion letters for any dispositive motions within two weeks of the date of this Memorandum and Order. (Gong, LiJia) |
Filing 89 PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION. Ordered by Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto on 10/3/2014. (Keefe, Reed) |
Filing 37 ORDER re 34 Letter filed by Gluco Perfect, LLC, 35 Letter filed by Perfect Gluco Products, Inc., Francine Freiman, William J. Gillen, USHH Products, Inc. Ordered by Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto on 3/26/2014. (Keefe, Reed) |
Filing 25 TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER. Ordered by Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto on 3/19/2014. (Keefe, Reed) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.