Integrity Electronics Inc. v. Garden State Distributors, Inc. et al
Integrity Electronics Inc. |
Charles & Mira Elmann Realty LLC, Digital World Camera & Electronics, Inc., Charles Elmann, Mira Elmann, Morris Elmann, Solly Elmann, G.S.D. Marketing Group, Inc. and Garden State Distributors, Inc. |
1:2014cv03197 |
May 22, 2014 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Brooklyn Office |
Brian M. Cogan |
Contract: Recovery/Enforcement |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 151 Memorandum Decision and Order dated 6/30/16 that plaintiffs motion for summary judgment is granted in part and denied in part. Defendants cross-motion for partial summary judgment is denied. Within 7 days of this Order, Plaintiff must submit a propos ed interest calculation, and defendants may respond within 7 days of plaintiffs submission. Additionally, plaintiff must indicate within 14 days of this Order whether it has evidence against Solly sufficient to create a triable issue of fact; otherwise, the claims against this defendant will be dismissed. ( Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 6/30/2016 ) (Guzzi, Roseann) |
Filing 22 ORDER denying 20 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; deferring ruling on 20 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 11/18/2014. (Cogan, Brian) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.