Lighting & Supplies, Inc. v. Sunlite USA Corporation
Plaintiff: Lighting & Supplies, Inc.
Defendant: Sunlite USA Corporation
Case Number: 1:2014cv04344
Filed: July 16, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Brooklyn Office
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 44 Trademark Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 17, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 84 MEMORANDUM & OPINION. The parties stipulate entry of a preliminary injunction. Defendants' motion [at 30 ] for a bond is denied. Defendant Mikail's 70 motion to vacate the default judgment against him is granted. Plaintiff' ;s 58 motion for an entry of the default judgment is denied. Defendant Mikail's 83 untimely answer is accepted. On October 8, 2014, plaintiff filed a 19 second amended complaint. A motion to amend the pleadings to substitute the real party of interest is granted on consent. The pleadings are amended to add Spotlite USA Corporation as a defendant. The case caption shall be amended to reflect this change. Plaintiff's 69 motion to dismiss defendant Sunlite USA w ithout prejudice is denied. Defendants deny all elements of the second amended complaint. Completion of discovery is respectfully referred to the magistrate judge. Discovery shall be expedited. The magistrate judge shall engage the parties in settlement discussions. The magistrate shall oversee settlement over 1) the terms of a final injunction; and 2) any possible damages. Trial on any damages shall commence on August 11, 2015 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom l OB South. Jury selection will occur on August 10, 2015 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom lOB South. At the request of plaintiff, the court shall select the jury. Argument on in limine motions will be heard on August 3, 2015 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 1OB South. Representatives from plaintiff and defendant, as well as defendant Mikail, shall appear in person at the in limine hearing. By July 27, 2015 at 10:00 a.m., the parties shall submit prop osed jury charges with verdict sheets, in limine motions, and supporting briefs. They shall exchange and docket: (1) lists of pre-marked exhibits proposed for use at trial and stipulations regarding admissibility; (2) lists of poten tial witnesses together with brief summaries of proposed testimony; (3) stipulations with respect to all undisputed facts; and (4) proposed voir dire. Copies shall be provided to the court. All expert reports shall be exchanged by July 27, 2015. Damages shall be calculated up to the first day of trial. The jury shall determine damages. Ordered by Judge Jack B. Weinstein on 6/16/2015. (Barrett, C)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lighting & Supplies, Inc. v. Sunlite USA Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lighting & Supplies, Inc.
Represented By: Bernard Malina
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sunlite USA Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?